Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Tami

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 28, 1979No. 95, 96, 97, and 98PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellants, husband and wife, were found guilty by Honorable Robert J. Wolfe, President Judge, in a non-jury trial for violating the Drug, Device and Cosmetic Act of 19721 by delivering a controlled substance. Post verdict motions having been filed and denied, sentence was imposed and these appeals followed.

Initially, appellants contend the charges against them should be dismissed under Pa.R.Crim.P. 1100 because they were denied a speedy trial. The procedural history of the case is as follows. The complaints against appellants were filed August 25, 1976, which made the original run date under…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  2. Commonwealth v. HicksonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  3. Commonwealth v. TaylorSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  4. Commonwealth v. HooksSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  5. Commonwealth v. LaudenslagerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. FortuneSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  2. Commonwealth v. SmithSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  3. Commonwealth v. TamiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  4. Commonwealth v. DanielsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  5. Commonwealth v. DanielsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API