Allstate Insurance Co. v. Dandan
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Herbert Kramer, J.
Is the award made to an infant in an uninsured motorist arbitration subject to vacatur on the ground that the award was inconsistent with the arbitrator’s findings and deviated materially from what could be considered reasonable compensation? In answering this question in the affirmative, this court was called upon to resolve the conundrum presented by the conflict between the inherent judicial obligation to safeguard an infant’s welfare and the strong policy disfavoring judicial review of arbitration proceedings.
In 1996, the infant respondents were…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Shurgan v. TedescoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Campbell v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Seidner v. UngerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Prudential Property & Casualty Insurance v. CarletonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- People ex rel. Fields v. KaufmannAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1959
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.