Domit Construction Co. v. Town of Mountain Woods
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
GOODWYN, Justice.
Appellee has moved to dismiss the appeal because appellant’s brief was not filed here within the time prescribed by Rule 12 of the Revised Rules of Practice in the Supreme Court. 261 Ala. XIX, XXIV; Recompiled Code 1958 (unofficial), Tit. 7, Appendix, p. 1164. The motion must be granted.
The transcript of the record was filed with the clerk of the Supreme Court on January 17, 1966. Accordingly,, under the provisions of Supreme Court Rule 12, appellant’s brief was due to be filed in this court .“within thirty days after” January 17th (this date not being included in calculating…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Neumiller v. JenkinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1960
- Tipton v. TiptonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1957
- Board of Commissioners of the City of Montgomery v. CrenshawSupreme Court of Alabama · 1960
- Black v. State ex rel. JohnsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1959
- Waterall v. WaterallSupreme Court of Alabama · 1959
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.