Legal Opinion

City of Chicago v. Piehl

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided April 20, 1909No. Gen. No. 14,460Published

Action of debt. Appeal from the Criminal Court of Cook county; the Hon. Geobge A. Dupuy, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Chytraus

It is conceded that the city had the power to pass the ordinances in question, as was held by this court in Hastings Express Company v. Chicago, 135 Ill. App. 268. In Harder’s Storage Co. v. Chicago, 235 Ill. 58, the Supreme Court of this state held that the city of Chicago had the power to impose a license or tax upon vehicles using its streets. By the three cases referred to the law is settled that, so far as these ordinances operate, the city of Chicago has the power to tax the occupation involved and the vehicles.

It is contended that the ordinances unlawfully discriminate between persons…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Harder's Fire Proof Storage & Van Co. v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Hastings Express Co. v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1907

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API