Feigi v. Lopartkovitch
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtWashburn, J.
■ In determining the question presented, we have but to keep in mind certain propositions of law, which, it seems to us are sound and well established,'and which are —first, that a minor can be sued and serv- , ;ed with process only in the manner set 'forth in the statutes of Ohio; second, that a minor cannot waive compliance with said statutes; third, that if the suit in question was hot commenced within two years after ‘'’the* date of the accident it is barred by the statute of limitations; and fourth, that regardless of when a petition is filed, a suit is not “commenced” until a summons is…
2Cited by8 opinions
- Lehman v. Horning, a MinorOhio Court of Appeals · 1955
- Smith v. WagnerOhio Court of Appeals · 1952
- Webb v. ChandlerOhio Court of Appeals · 1959
- Thrasher v. KellyOhio Court of Appeals · 1943
- Bobo v. BellOhio Court of Appeals · 1959
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.