Legal Opinion

Feigi v. Lopartkovitch

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided October 21, 1930No. 529PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWashburn, J.

■ In determining the question presented, we have but to keep in mind certain propositions of law, which, it seems to us are sound and well established,'and which are —first, that a minor can be sued and serv- , ;ed with process only in the manner set 'forth in the statutes of Ohio; second, that a minor cannot waive compliance with said statutes; third, that if the suit in question was hot commenced within two years after ‘'’the* date of the accident it is barred by the statute of limitations; and fourth, that regardless of when a petition is filed, a suit is not “commenced” until a summons is…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Lehman v. Horning, a MinorOhio Court of Appeals · 1955
  2. Smith v. WagnerOhio Court of Appeals · 1952
  3. Webb v. ChandlerOhio Court of Appeals · 1959
  4. Thrasher v. KellyOhio Court of Appeals · 1943
  5. Bobo v. BellOhio Court of Appeals · 1959

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API