Legal Opinion
Williams v. New York State Board of Parole
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 28, 1996PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*491This matter was not rendered moot merely because the maximum term of petitioner’s sentence has expired (Matter of Biondo v New York State Bd. of Parole, 60 NY2d 832; Matter of Justiano v New York State Bd. of Parole, 189 AD2d 566). Contrary to petitioner’s contention, there was substantial evidence, including the properly admitted hearsay testimony (People ex rel. McGee v Walters, 62 NY2d 317), adduced at the parole revocation hearing that the vehicle he was driving was stolen, that he knew it was stolen and that he lacked authorization to use it (300 Gramatan Ave. Assocs. v State Div. of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- 300 Gramatan Avenue Associates v. State Division of Human RightsNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- Biondo v. New York State Board of ParoleNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- People ex rel. McGee v. WaltersNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Justiano v. New York State Board of ParoleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
3Cited by3 opinions
- People ex rel. Fryer v. BeaverAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Mack v. AlexanderAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Laporta v. New York State BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998