Legal Opinion
State v. Hall
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided May 5, 2017No. 2016-CA-13PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHall, P.J.
{¶ 1} The State of Ohio appeals, pursuant to R.C. 2945.67(A) and Crim.R. 12(K), from the trial court's decision and judgment entry sustaining defendant-appellee Taylor D. Hall's motion to suppress evidence.
{¶ 2} In its sole assignment of error, the State contends the trial court erred in suppressing drug-related evidence found through a canine sniff of Hall's car during a traffic stop. The State argues that the sniff occurred within the amount of time deemed reasonable for a traffic stop.
{¶ 3} Suppression-hearing testimony reflects that patrolman Jeremy Towe stopped Hall's car at 1:31 a.m. on…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. BurnsideOhio Supreme Court · 2003
- Rodriguez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
- United States v. John Jay Hill and Malcolm Scott HillCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
- State v. BatchiliOhio Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. HillOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- State v. KeisterOhio Court of Appeals · 2022
- State v. LawlerOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
- State v. MastonOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
- State v. BurkeOhio Court of Appeals · 2022
- State v. HallOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.