Legal Opinion

Colarik v. Young

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided June 18, 1962No. 1517PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, P. J.

The trial court sustained a demurrer to the plaintiff-appellant’s second amended petition. The court took the position, in sustaining the demurrer in each instance, that the petition did not state a cause of action. The facts stated in the petition and the amended petition indicate clearly that the injury, upon which plaintiff’s claimed right of participation in the State Insurance Fund was founded, was not accidental in character, as defined in Dripps v. Industrial Commission of Ohio, 165 Ohio St., 407.

The trial judge, after sustaining the demurrer to the amended petition, denied the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Lichter v. Land Title Guarantee & Trust Co., Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Franklin County, Civil Division1955

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Solowitch v. BennettOhio Court of Appeals · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API