Suzanne J. Marcy v. Delta Airlines, a Georgia Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1DissentGraber, Circuit Judge
I respectfully dissent, because the majority has departed from proper methods of statutory construction and has created an opportunity for forum-shopping in Montana wrongful termination cases.
First, the majority uses an improper method of statutory interpretation when it relies on a proposed legislative amendment that failed, Op. at 1283-84, as a means to interpret the law that survived unchanged. There are many reasons why a proposed amendment fails. Some legislators may believe that the amendment is unnecessary, because the statute already means the same thing; some may oppose the amendment…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Meech v. Hillhaven West, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1989
- Buck v. Billings Montana Chevrolet, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1991
- Mysse v. MartensMontana Supreme Court · 1996
- Kestell v. Heritage Health Care Corp.Montana Supreme Court · 1993
- Cecil v. Cardinal Drilling Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1990
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.