City of Cleveland v. United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge WALD.
WALD, Circuit Judge:
Petitioners Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company, Ohio Edison Company, and Toledo Edison Company (“Licensees”) seek review of an order by the United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission (“NRC” or “Commission”) denying their applications to suspend antitrust conditions imposed on two nuclear power plants owned by Licensees. The City of Cleveland, American Municipal Power-Ohio, and the City of Brook Park (“Cleveland”) also appeal a separate order by the Commission denying their challenge to its statutory authority to…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Associated General Contractors of California, Inc. v. California State Council of CarpentersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- K Mart Corp. v. Cartier, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Crandon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- United States v. ShimerSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- City Of Cleveland, Ohio v. United States Nuclear Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1995
- Kahrs Int'l, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2009