Legal Opinion

Blundell v. Wallace

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 2, 1925No. 276PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Sutherland

This is a suit to quiet title to a one-third interest in homestead and surplus lands originally allotted to Patsy Poff, fb half-blood Choctaw Indian woman, under the Act of July 1, 1902, c. 1362, 32 Stat. 641. She died August 7, 1916, David H. Poff; her husband, surviving. By her will made in 1912, 'which was duly probated, she devised the entire allotment to Juanita and Oleta Blundell, her great granddaughters, bequeathing to her husband only a nominal sum.' Defendant in error asserts title through mesne conveyances vesting in him the interest of David H. Poff. His suit is based on the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Blanset v. CardinSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  2. Jefferson v. FinkSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  3. Taylor v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  4. Blundell v. WallaceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Spaniard v. TantomSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  2. Caesar v. BurgessCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1939
  3. Homovich v. Chapman, Secretary of the InteriorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1951
  4. Hanson v. HoffmanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1940
  5. Alexander v. SamuelsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API