Legal Opinion
In re Timothy M.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 14, 1996PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Crew III, J.
By two petitions verified December 28, 1994, respondent was charged with committing acts which, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crimes of petit larceny, burglary in the third degree and grand larceny in the fourth degree. Following respondent’s initial appearance and arraignment, he appeared before Family Court with his Law Guardian and informed the court that he had decided to accept a plea bargain and pleaded guilty to petit larceny in satisfaction of both petitions. Family Court accepted this plea following a colloquy with respondent, and a dispositional hearing…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- In re Edgar Q.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- In re Herbert RR.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- In re Herbert TT.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
3Cited by6 opinions
- In re Tiffany MM.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- In re Joshua HH.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- In re Robert OO.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- In re Daquan BB.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- In re Lee S.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.