Legal Opinion

Bennett v. United States Cycling Federation

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 4, 1987No. B022865PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

EPSTEIN, J. *

Albert Bennett (plaintiff) appeals from the dismissal of his complaint following the granting of a motion for summary judgment by defendants, United States Cycling Federation and others (jointly referred to as USCF or defendants). The appeal concerns the enforceability of a printed agreement to hold harmless and release (release) signed by plaintiff prior to his sustaining injuries in defendants’ bicycle race. Since we conclude that there is a triable issue of material fact as to whether the release covers plaintiff’s claims, we must reverse the judgment.

Facts

On June 10,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Tunkl v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Stationers Corp. v. Dun & Bradstreet, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1965
  3. O'CONNELL v. Walt Disney World CompanyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
  4. Conn v. National Can CorporationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
  5. Celli v. Sports Car Club of America, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1972

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. City of Santa Barbara v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Madison v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
  3. Westlye v. Look Sports, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1993
  4. Frittelli, Inc. v. 350 North Canon Drive, LPCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  5. Benedek v. PLC Santa MonicaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API