Allan v. Putnam County National Bank (In Re Allan)
United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ROBERT N. OPEL, II, Bankruptcy Judge.
One of the Chapter 7 Debtors, Richard W. Allan (“Debtor”), filed a Motion to avoid a judicial lien held by the Respondent, Putnam County National Bank (“Bank”). For the reasons stated herein, I find that the lien of the Bank’s judgment is avoidable as impairing the tenancy by the entirety exemption in Pennsylvania real property owned jointly by the Debtor and his filing spouse.
I. Jurisdiction
This Court has jurisdiction over this matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1334 and 157(b)(2). This is a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A) and (K).
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Taylor v. Freeland & KronzSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Owen v. OwenSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Gary T. Napotnik v. Equibank and Parkvale Savings AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
- In Re SimonsonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1985
- Stop 35, Inc. v. HainesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Bucchino v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (In Re Bucchino)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Mexico · 2010
- Holber v. Segal (In re Segal)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2014