Legal Opinion

Diocese of Buffalo v. State

New York Court of Appeals

Decided April 10, 1969No. Claim No. 43266; Claim No. 44079; Claim No. 43964PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Chief Judge Fuld.

In each of these three condemnation proceedings, we are called primarily upon to decide the method to be employed in computing a claimant’s damages where there has been a partial taking of cemetery lands. Since this question of law is applicable to all three appeals, it may be helpful to discuss it before undertaking a more detailed consideration of each of the several appeals themselves.

It is settled that, as a general proposition, the measure of damages in partial taking cases is the difference between the value of the whole before the taking and the value of the remainder…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Boston Chamber of Commerce v. City of BostonSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  2. Matter of City of New York (Fourth Ave.)New York Court of Appeals · 1930

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Gyrodyne Co. of America, Inc. v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  2. Board of Commissioners of Great Neck Park District v. Kings Point Heights, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  3. Chemical Corp. v. Town of East HamptonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  4. Mil-Pine Plaza, Inc. v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
  5. Lerner Pavlick Realty v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API