Legal Opinion

Seh-v-Nancy Berryhill

District Court, N.D. California

Decided June 8, 2021No. 4:18-cv-00885Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 LO MEI SEH, Case No. 18-cv-00885-DMR 9 Plaintiff, ORDER RE PLAINTIFF’S COUNSEL’S 10 v. MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES 11 NANCY A. BERRYHILL, 12 Defendant. 13 Plaintiff Lo Mei Seh filed a complaint seeking to reverse the Commissioner of the Social 14 Security Administration’s administrative decision to deny her application for benefits under Title II 15 of the Social Security Act,

42 U.S.C. § 401

et seq. The court granted in part Plaintiff’s motion for 16 summary judgment and remanded the case for further proceedings.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Parrish v. Commissioner of Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  2. Smith v. Wisconsin Department of Agriculture, Trade & Consumer ProtectionCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
  3. Diesel Tanker A. C. Dodge Inc. v. StewartDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API