Legal Opinion

Spurgeon v. Union National Bank

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 11, 1933No. 30,938PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Harvey, J.:

This is an action for a sum plaintiff claimed was due her on deposit in the defendant bank. The bank answered, admitting the deposit, and alleged that the amount claimed had been paid out on checks signed by plaintiff. In her reply plaintiff denied signing the check referred to, or authorizing anyone to do so, and alleged the checks were forged. The jury found plaintiff’s signature to the checks in question had been forged and returned a verdict for plaintiff. Defendant has appealed.

Appellant first contends that the court erred in placing…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kansas City Title & Trust Co. v. Fourth National BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1932
  2. Grand Lodge of the Ancient Order of United Workmen v. State BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1914
  3. Kopke Bros. Mercantile v. California Coöperative Canneries Ass'nSupreme Court of Kansas · 1927
  4. Goddard v. Citizens First National Bank of IndependenceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1924

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Boris S. Browzin v. Catholic University of America, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975
  2. Thoroughbred Associates, L.L.C. v. Kansas City Royalty Co., L.L.C.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2013
  3. Thoroughbred Assoc. v. Kansas Royalty Co.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API