Legal Opinion

Mahar v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation

District Court, E.D. Louisiana

Decided April 13, 2022No. 2:20-cv-02994Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA CAMILLE L. MAHAR CIVIL ACTION VERSUS NO. 20-2994-WBV-DMD NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER SECTION: D (3) CORPORATION ORDER AND REASONS Before the Court is Amtrak’s Motion to Strike Plaintiff’s Untimely Supplemental Witness and Exhibit Lists, Motion to Strike Ashley Peter as a Fact Witness And, in the Alternative, Motion in Limine to Exclude Ashley Peter’s Testimony.1 Plaintiff opposes the Motion,2 and Amtrak has filed a Reply.3 After careful consideration of the parties’ memoranda and the applicable law, the Motion is GRANTED. I. FACTUAL…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Robert Geiserman v. John H. MacDonald A.B. & A.B. & AssociatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
  2. Texas A&M Research Foundation v. Magna Transportation, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2003
  3. Barrett v. Atlantic Richfield Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
  4. Perez v. City of New OrleansDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API