Mahar v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation
District Court, E.D. Louisiana
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA CAMILLE L. MAHAR CIVIL ACTION VERSUS NO. 20-2994-WBV-DMD NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER SECTION: D (3) CORPORATION ORDER AND REASONS Before the Court is Amtrak’s Motion to Strike Plaintiff’s Untimely Supplemental Witness and Exhibit Lists, Motion to Strike Ashley Peter as a Fact Witness And, in the Alternative, Motion in Limine to Exclude Ashley Peter’s Testimony.1 Plaintiff opposes the Motion,2 and Amtrak has filed a Reply.3 After careful consideration of the parties’ memoranda and the applicable law, the Motion is GRANTED. I. FACTUAL…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Robert Geiserman v. John H. MacDonald A.B. & A.B. & AssociatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
- Texas A&M Research Foundation v. Magna Transportation, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2003
- Barrett v. Atlantic Richfield Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
- Perez v. City of New OrleansDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2016