Legal Opinion

King-Kup Candies, Inc., Applicant-Appellant v. King Candy Company, Opposer-Appellee

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided April 14, 1961No. Patent Appeal 6633PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KIRKPATRICK, Judge.

This is an appeal by the applicant, King-Kup Candies, Inc., from the decision of the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board sustaining an opposition to the registration of the trademark, “KingKup.”

The opposer is King Candy Company, registrant of “King’s” and “King’s for American Queens,” and its priority is not disputed.

*945Both parties are manufacturers of candy and the goods in connection with which the marks are used are generally the same.

Neither party has made any point of the slight difference between the words “King” and “King’s” nor of the fact that each of the competing…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bon Ami Co. v. McKesson & Robbins, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1938
  2. National Drying & MacHinery Company v. AckoffDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1955

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Pizzeria Uno Corporation v. James W. Temple, Jr., D/B/A Taco UnoCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1984
  2. King Candy Co. v. Eunice King's Kitchen, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1974
  3. Vertex Distributing, Inc. v. Falcon Foam Plastics, Inc., Falcon Manufacturing of California, Inc., James Allen, and Michael AllenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
  4. In Re Chatam International IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
  5. Robert Bruce, Inc. v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1972

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API