Stephen Slesinger, Inc. v. Disney Enterprises, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
1DissentReyna, Circuit Judge
The issue before us is whether the district court decided the ownership of the Winnie-the-Pooh trademarks. Because I believe the district court did not decide ownership of the Pooh trademarks, and because I believe that a decision on ownership was not necessary to the district court’s decision concerning trademark infringement, I respectfully dissent.
I. Collateral Estoppel
Collateral estoppel, often called “issue preclusion,” bars relitigation in a second action of an issue litigated and decided in a prior action. Because preclusion may forever bar meritorious claims and negate significant…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Russell v. PlaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Mother's Restaurant Incorporated v. Mama's Pizza, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- De Forest Radio Telephone Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Exxon Corporation v. Oxxford Clothes, Inc. And Oxxford Clothes Xx, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.