Legal Opinion

Mitchell v. Scott

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided September 27, 1928No. 2179PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appellee Scott sued William Jessen and recovered judgment for $673.83. A writ of garnishment was sued out against appellant, Mitchell, and served February 16, 1928. Appellant answered in the negative the matters inquired of in the writ, which answer was controverted. Upon trial without a jury, judgment was rendered in Scott's favor for the sum above mentioned.

While we do not agree with the conclusion of law upon which the trial court based its judgment, nevertheless the judgment rendered is correct upon the undisputed facts.

At the time the writ was served, Jessen, doing business as the El…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Christmas v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  2. Rowlett v. LaneTexas Supreme Court · 1875
  3. Alliance Milling Co. v. Eaton, Guinan & Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Goggin v. State Nat. Bank of El PasoCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
  5. Patterson v. Citizens' Nat. Bank of LubbockCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1921

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Quinn v. DupreeTexas Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Dupree v. QuinnCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1956
  3. Gohring v. KoonceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1938
  4. In re American CreameriesDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API