Davis, Et Vir v. Battle
Supreme Court of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
Thomas, J. —
As will be seen, this is the second chapter in the story of this litigation. A thorough discussion of the issues involved in the controversy appears in the decision of this Court, Davis v. Battle, 132 Fla. 240, 182 South. Rep. 243, 117 A. L. R. 742, and on the record then presented to the Court it was decided that the chancellor erred in entering a decree in behalf of the plaintiffs, this language having been used in the conclusion: “The decree appealed from is reversed for further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion.” 132 Fla., text page 252; 182 So., text page 248;…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Palm Beach Estates v. CrokerSupreme Court of Florida · 1932
- Simpson v. WarrenSupreme Court of Florida · 1932
- Grand Lodge, Knights of Pythias v. StroudSupreme Court of Florida · 1932
- Blodgett v. SteinmetzSupreme Court of Florida · 1929
- Davis, Et Vir v. BattleSupreme Court of Florida · 1938
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of Florida · 1960
- Bredin v. BredinSupreme Court of Florida · 1958
- Hilgendorf v. DensonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1975