Agrodyne, Inc. v. Beard
Idaho Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
WALTERS, Chief Judge.
The respondents, Agrodyne, Inc. and Energy Incorporated, filed suit to collect the balance due on a contract to provide an ethanol fuel production system for the defendants, Gail and Irene Beard. The Beards counterclaimed for damages, alleging the system installed by the respondents was incomplete and defective. Eventually, the case was dismissed by the district court, purporting to act under I.R.C.P. 40(c).1
The Beards appeal. They raise two issues. First, did the court err by dismissing the action when the Beards failed to comply with an order of the court to post a bond…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Kirkham v. 4.60 Acres of Land in Vicinity of InkomIdaho Supreme Court · 1980
- Idaho Power Co. v. Idaho Public Utilities CommissionIdaho Supreme Court · 1981
- Swanson v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1960
- Matter of Estate of KunzlerIdaho Court of Appeals · 1985
- Grant v. City of Twin FallsIdaho Court of Appeals · 1987
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Sato v. SchossbergerIdaho Supreme Court · 1990
- Madsen v. NuxollIdaho Court of Appeals · 1991
- Marvin F. Morgan v. Michael A. Demos, M.D.Idaho Supreme Court · 2014
- Marvin F. Morgan v. Michael A. Demos, M.D.Idaho Supreme Court · 2014