Legal Opinion

Handrigan v. Apex Warwick, Inc.

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided March 23, 1971No. 1092-AppealPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPaolino, J.

The plaintiff brought this civil action to recover damages for personal injuries sustained in a fall from an aluminum ladder which had been purchased by a friend of the plaintiff from the defendant, Apex Warwick, Inc., and which was allegedly manufactured by the defendant, Griffith Ladder Company. The action against Apex was brought under the implied warranty provision of the Uniform Commercial Code, G. L. 1956, §6A-2-314, as amended by P. L. 1960, chap. 147, sec. 1. The action against Griffith sounded in tort.

The case was heard by a justice of the Superior Court sitting with a jury. At the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Henry v. John W. Eshelman & SonsSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1965
  2. Tomczuk v. Town of CheshireConnecticut Superior Court · 1965
  3. Richard v. H. P. Hood & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1968
  4. D'Agostino v. Yellow Cab Company of ProvidenceSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1969
  5. Finocchiaro v. Ward Baking CompanySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1968

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Thomas v. Amway Corp.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1985
  2. Lariviere v. Dayton Safety Ladder Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1987
  3. Colantuoni v. Calcagni & SonsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API