Legal Opinion

Billingsley's Heirs v. Billingsley

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 15, 1861PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from the Chancery Court of Perry, Heard before the Hon. Jakes B. Clakk.

1Opinion of the CourtR. W. Walker, J.

The main object of the bill was, to reform a deed of conveyance for land, so as to include certain lands which, by mistake, were omitted therefrom, and to exclude certain other lands which, by a like mistake, *426were included therein. The allegation of the bill is, that the deed, as executed, includes- the west half of the northwest quarter, and the south-west .quarter, of section i'liirty- < two, in township nineteen, range seven, which was not embraced in the purchase, and was inserted, by mistake, in lieu of the corresponding portions of section tiventy-Uvo, .'in the same township and range,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bell v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1859
  2. Crothers v. LeeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1856
  3. Masterson v. MastersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1858
  4. Williams v. Mitchell's Adm'rSupreme Court of Alabama · 1857
  5. Flake v. Day & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1853

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Grand Bay Land Co. v. SimpsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
  2. Black v. WoodruffSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915
  3. Gralapp v. HillSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
  4. Hamilton v. Terry Furniture & Loan Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1921
  5. Hart v. McClellanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1867

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API