Legal Opinion

Jost v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 18, 1994No. 93-349PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

The state concedes that appellant’s sentence is illegal under our prior decisions1 but has asked that we reconsider. In the meantime, in light of the recent en banc opinions of the Second District in Summers v. State, 625 So.2d 876 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993), another panel of this court has certified to the supreme court the following question:

MUST A TRIAL COURT, UPON REVOCATION OF PROBATION, CREDIT PREVIOUS TIME SERVED ON PROBATION TO ANY NEWLY IMPOSED TERM OF COMMUNITY CONTROL AND PROBATION SO THAT THE TOTAL PERIOD OF COMMUNITY CONTROL AND PROBATION DOES NOT EXCEED THE STATUTORY MAXIMUM FOR A…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ogden v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
  2. Summers v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
  3. Wardell v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Eanes v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
  2. Eanes v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API