Legal Opinion
Carnegie Trust Co. v. Rudolph Kleybolte & Co.
New York Supreme Court
Decided November 15, 1911PublishedCited by 2 opinions
Motion to set aside the verdict .of a jury rendered against defendants by direction of the court.-
1Opinion of the CourtGreenbaum, J.
Motion by defendants Rudolph Kleybolte & Company to set aside the verdict of a jury rendered against them by direction of the court. The action was brought to recover the sum of $137,955.35, the balance alleged to be due upon a promissory note for $375,000 made by Rudolph Kleybolte & Company to the order of the Carnegie Trust Company. The circumstances under which this note was executed, as detailed by the defendants and their witnesses, may be briefly stated as follows: On March 9, 1908, the date upon which a note of a corporation known as the Fidelity Funding Company, held by the Carnegie…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Jamestown Business College Assn. v. . AllenNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
- Smith v. . DotterweichNew York Court of Appeals · 1911
- Jagger Iron Co. v. . WalkerNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
- In re the Contested Will of TredwellNew York Surrogate's Court · 1908
3Cited by2 opinions
- Abrams v. American Security & Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1940
- Armstrong Cork & Insulation Co. v. PironeCity of New York Municipal Court · 1930