Legal Opinion

Ragan v. Smith

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided May 17, 1934No. 9843PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

1. A judgment recovered in a suit against a partnership binds the partnership assets and the individual assets of the partners served. Civil Code (1910), §§ 3167, 5591, 5592; Ells v. Bone, 71 Ga. 466. The judgment need not be rendered expressly against the individual members who are served, in order to bind individual assets. Ferry v. Mattox, 2 Ga. App. 104 (58 S. E. 291).

2. The petition for injunction in this case set forth as an exhibit a copy of an affidavit of illegality which had previously been filed by the plaintiff, and in which it was declared that the judgment was rendered in a suit…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Krueger v. MacDougaldSupreme Court of Georgia · 1918
  2. Ferry & Co. v. Mattox & TurnerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
  3. Ells v. BoneSupreme Court of Georgia · 1883
  4. Wolfe v. Georgia Railway & Electric Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1906
  5. Warren Brick Co. v. Lagarde Lime & Stone Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1912

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Porter v. HardinCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1947
  2. Seaboard Air Line Railroad v. WilkinsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API