Legal Opinion
Goldstine v. FedEx Freight, Inc.
District Court, W.D. Washington
Decided September 11, 2020No. 2:18-cv-01164Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 9 10 DAVID GOLDSTINE, CASE NO. C18-1164 MJP 11 Plaintiff, ORDER RE: DAUBERT MOTIONS 12 v. 13 FEDEX FREIGHT INC, 14 Defendant. 15 16 The above-entitled Court, having received and reviewed: 17 1. Plaintiff’s Second Motion to Exclude Testimony per Daubert v. Merrell Dow 18 Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (Dkt. No. 216), Defendant’s Opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion to 19 Exclude Testimony per Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (Dkt. No. 223), 20 and Plaintiff’s Reply re: Second Motion to Exclude Testimony per…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Farmer Brothers Company, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. Diana Estrada, Plaintiff-Intervenor-Appellee-Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Sangster v. United Air Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Hughes v. MayoralDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2010