Legal Opinion

Thomas v. Murphy

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 11, 1934No. 10157PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRAVES, Justice.

On a former day of this term, without written opinion, this court sustained a motion of the appellees to dismiss the appeal in this cause on a holding that there was no jurisdiction here to further entertain it, since, under the facts presented, the appellant’s motion for new trial below was not presented there within the 30 days after it was filed as required by subdivision 28 of article 2092 as amended (Acts 41st Legislature, 5th Called Session, c. 70 [Vernon’s Ann. Civ. St. art. 2092, subd. 28]); the court a quo being one subject to the provisions of chapter VI of title 42…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Nevitt v. WilsonTexas Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Townes v. Lattimore Dist. JudgeTexas Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Millers Mut. Fire Ins. Co. v. WilkirsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Thomason v. WiebuschCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
  2. Masterson v. BinghamCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
  3. Fidelity Trust Co. of Houston v. Highland Farms Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1937
  4. Houston Life Ins. Co. v. DabbsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934
  5. Thomas v. MurphyTexas Supreme Court · 1935

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API