Legal Opinion

Sieg v. Sears Roebuck & Co.

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided February 24, 2012No. 3:10cv606PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

JAMES M. MUNLEY, District Judge.

Before the court is Third-Party Defendant Primax Electronics’ motion to dismiss Defendant / Third-Party Plaintiff Levitón Manufacturing’s third-party complaint. (Doc. 31). Primax moves to dismiss pursuant to Rules 12(b)(2) and 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The issues have been fully briefed and the matter is ripe for disposition. For the following reasons, the court will dismiss Third-Party Defendant Primax Electronics pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(2) for lack of personal jurisdiction.

*323Background

This case arises…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  4. Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Solano Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State of Tennessee v. NV Sumatra Tobacco Trading CompanyTennessee Supreme Court · 2013
  2. In re Chinese Manufactured Drywall Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2012
  3. Shanika K. Lewis v. Conagra Brands, Inc. f/k/a and Successor in Interest to Conagra Foods/ Shanika K. Lewis v. DS Containers, Inc. and PSMT, LLC d/b/a PricesmartSuperior Court of The Virgin Islands · 2023
  4. State of Tennessee v. NV Sumatra Tobacco Trading CompanyTennessee Supreme Court · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API