Legal Opinion

John A. Roebling's Sons Co. v. Winthrop Hematite Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 18, 1888PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Assumpsit. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.

The plaintiff is a manufacturer of iron and steel rope in New Jersey. The defendant operates an open-pit iron mine near Ishpeming, in this State.

In the month of August, 1883, H. L. Shippey, the agent of the plaintiff, made, while in Ishpeming, a contract with defendant for the delivery of 2,000 feet of No. 1 Bessemer steel wire rope, 2-£ inches in diameter, which was to be used by the defendant for conveying power from the pump-house on the surface to the pumps at the bottom of the mine. It was figured that the rope would be subjected to a. working strain of 18 tons, and Mr. Shippey, with the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Perkins v. HartSupreme Court of the United States · 1826
  2. Lockwood v. . ThorneNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
  3. Wiggins v. BurkhamSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
  4. Freeland v. Heron, Lenox & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1812
  5. American National Bank v. BusheyMichigan Supreme Court · 1881

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hakes v. ThayerMichigan Supreme Court · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API