Legal Opinion

Clarence Benjamin Townsend and Julia Mydea Randall Townsend v. U.S. Department of Justice Immigration and Naturalization Service

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided September 8, 1986No. 86-4300PublishedCited by 79 opinions

1Per curiam

Petitioners appeal the denial by an immigration judge of their applications for asylum, asserting that the judge erred in finding the male petitioner’s testimony in conflict with responses on his original application for asylum and therefore not credible. Because petitioners failed to exhaust their administrative remedies by perfecting an appeal to the Board of Immigration Appeals, we are without jurisdiction to review the denial of asylum.

I

Petitioners, Benjamin Clarence Townsend and Julia Mydea Randall Townsend, are natives and citizens of Liberia who entered the United States in 1979 as…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Eluska v. AndrusCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
  2. HOLGUINBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1969
  3. Gladis Trejo Hernandez v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976

3Cited by79 opinions

  1. Julio Lozada v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
  2. Kuang-Te Wang v. AshcroftCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
  3. Barbara Ronda Meliezer, Wife Of/and Karl A. Loetzerich v. Resolution Trust Company, as Receiver for Home Savings and Loan AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
  4. Byron L. Taylor v. United States Treasury Department, Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997
  5. Goonsuwan v. AshcroftCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001

74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API