Legal Opinion

Dick v. Race Bros. Farm Supply, Inc.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided April 22, 1987No. 14919PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiff filed a two-count petition, each count seeking actual and punitive damages. Count I was based upon conversion of plaintiffs “farm equipment and supplies”. Count II, for malicious prosecution, claimed that defendant caused plaintiff to be charged with “stealing” and he was acquitted of that charge. During trial with a jury the judge sustained defendant’s motion for directed verdict and entered judgment for defendant on both counts. Plaintiff appeals.

Plaintiffs claims apparently arise out of the incidents described in State v. Dick, 636 S.W.2d 425 (Mo.App.1982). In that matter…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. DickMissouri Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. McMahon v. Charles Schulze, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1972
  3. MAJ Investment Corp. v. WerschingMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Baxter v. Acme Sheet Metal Works, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1989
  2. Robert E. Denton, Inc. v. Spelman Memorial HospitalMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API