Legal Opinion

Kupferberg v. Horowitz

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided January 15, 1907PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal by the plaintiff from a judgment of the Municipal Court of the city of New York, fifth district, borough of Manhattan, rendered in favor of the defendant.

1Opinion of the CourtBlanchard, J.

The defendant endorsed two promissory notes for $100 each, which by their terms were made payable at a bank in Newark, New Jersey, and refused to pay them on the ground that he did not receive notice of their dishonor. The learned court below g’ave judgment for the defendant and we think he erred in so doing. The notes were made by one Sehwartzman and endorsed by the defend-, ant Horowitz, at the time they were delivered to the payee, who is the plaintiff. They also bear the signature of the payee, presumably for discount or collection. At the time of maturity they were presented for payment…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. McAndrew v. . RadwayNew York Court of Appeals · 1866

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. H. Herrmann Lumber Co. v. BjurstromAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API