Legal Opinion

Dreisbach v. Mechanics' National Bank

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 4, 1886PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error to the Court of Common Pleas of Carbon county: Of January Term 1886, No. 389. This case was commenced by a writ of attachment under the Act of March 17th, 1869, returnable June lltli, 1883, issued by the Mechanics’ National Bank of Philadelphia, against the Miners Bank of Summit Hill, April 16th, 1883. The sheriff executed the writ and made the following return.

Read the full summary

Error to the Court of Common Pleas of Carbon county: Of January Term 1886, No. 389. This case was commenced by a writ of attachment under the Act of March 17th, 1869, returnable June lltli, 1883, issued by the Mechanics’ National Bank of Philadelphia, against the Miners Bank of Summit Hill, April 16th, 1883. The sheriff executed the writ and made the following return. “I, Charles W. Lentz, sheriff, do hereby return that I have served the within writ of attachment on the defendant therein named, to wit: The Miners Bank, of Summit Hill, on the 17th of April, A. D. 1883, by attaching all the…

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Green

An examination of the sheriff’s return in this case shows that he complied literally and specifically with all the requirements of the second section of the Act of 17th March, 1869, (Bright. Purd. 54 pl. 74) in serving the writ. The Act directs that the attachment “ shall be served by the sheriff &c., by attaching so much of the money, stocks, rights in action, evidences of debt or other property of said party defendant not exempt by law from sale upon execution as will be .sufficient to pay the debt demanded, with costs; and shall deliver to said defendant or defendants or one of them, a…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Rice v. WalinsziusSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1900
  2. Munis v. OliverSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1903
  3. Miller v. BruffSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
  4. Cardona Toro v. Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
  5. Cardona Toro v. Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API