Legal Opinion
Cartridge Actuated Devices, Inc. v. The Flinchbaugh Company, Inc., v. Bodycote Thermal Processing, Inc.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided July 10, 2026No. 2:26-cv-01131Unknown
1Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY CARTRIDGE ACTUATED DEVICES, INC, Plaintiff, v. THE FLINCHBAUGH COMPANY, INC., Case No. 2:26-cv-01131 (BRM) (MAH) Defendant/Third-Party Plaintiff, OPINION v. BODYCOTE THERMAL PROCESSING, INC., Third-Party Defendant. MARTINOTTI, DISTRICT JUDGE Before this Court is a motion by Plaintiff Cartridge Actuated Devices, Inc. (“Cartridge”) to remand this action to the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Essex County (“Superior Court of New Jersey”), which includes a request for attorneys’ fees and costs (“Motion”).1…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Martin v. Franklin Capital Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Shamell Samuel-Bassett, on Behalf of Herself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Kia Motors America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
- Foster v. Chesapeake Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
- Pas v. Travelers Insurance Company, and J.T. Baker, Inc. And Richardson-Vicks, Inc. Honorable John C. Lifland, United States District Judge for the District of New Jersey, Nominal Pas v. Travelers Insurance Company J.T. Baker, Inc. And Richardson-Vicks, Inc. Travelers Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- Di Loreto v. CostiganCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.