Legal Opinion
Wells v. Halmac Development, Inc.
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided February 3, 2016No. 3D12-3039PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ON MOTION FO REVIEW
LAGOA, J.
Pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.400(c), Diane N. Wells and Thomas O. Wells (collectively “Petitioners”) seek review of the trial court’s Final Judgment Awarding Appellate Attorneys’ Fees rendered on December 10, 2014 (the “Appellate Fee Judgment”). Petitioners’ motion asserts that the Appellate Fee Judgment fails to take account of prejudgment interest on the $36,000 amount of appellate attorneys’ fees awarded to Petitioners. We agree. Because the trial court failed to follow applicable law in not including prejudgment interest in Petitioners’…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Quality Engineered Installation, Inc. v. Higley South, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1996
- CLEARWATER FEDERAL S. & L. ASSOCIATION v. SampsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1976
- Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc. v. HerronDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
- Eastern Industries v. Florida UacDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007
- D'Alusio v. Gould & Lamb, LLCDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Lana v. Assimakopoulos-PanuthosDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
- Lana v. Assimakopoulous-PanuthosDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017