Legal Opinion

Thomas v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided November 6, 1997No. CR 96-803PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Donald L. Corbin, Justice.

Appellant Nathaniel Thomas appeals the denial of relief under Arkansas Rule of Criminal Procedure 37 from the Pulaski County Circuit Court. Appellant asserts that the trial court erred in denying the Rule 37 petition because his attorney was ineffective by failing to timely renew the motion for directed verdict at the conclusion of Appellant’s case, thus barring a challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence on appeal. Our jurisdiction is pursuant to Ark. Sup. Ct. R. 1 -2(a) (4). We affirm.

Appellant was charged along with three other men, James Ellison, Lawrence…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Gardner v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
  3. Cassell v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1981
  4. Passley v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
  5. Missildine v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Noel v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  2. Pyle v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  3. Greene v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004
  4. Kemp v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
  5. McCraney v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2010

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API