Legal Opinion

Kleinfeld v. K-D Lamp Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 30, 1951PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an action to recover salesman’s commissions allegedly due him, plaintiff appeals from an order denying his motion for the fixation of a date for defendant's examination before trial, and for other relief. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. There was no abuse of discretion by the Special Term in denying the motion as, upon the papers submitted, plaintiff was guilty of gross neglect and laches in the prosecution of his action. We are advised that after *794the instant order was made, plaintiff’s motion to restore the cause to the calendar for trial was granted and defendant’s…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Day v. . Town of New LotsNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
  2. Matter of PrimeNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
  3. In re the City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Alexatos v. RakAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
  2. Clearview Associates, Inc. v. Clearview Gardens First Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API