Legal Opinion
Hurtado v. Florida Farm Bureau Casualty Co.
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided February 13, 1990No. 89-958PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BASKIN, Judge.
Rigoberto Hurtado and Susana Hurtado, his wife, appeal a final summary judgment in favor of Florida Farm Bureau Casualty Company [FFB] denying them the right to stack uninsured motorist coverage. We reverse.
Rigoberto Hurtado sustained severe injuries when a vehicle driven by Jose Arauz, an uninsured motorist, struck his automobile. Hurtado was driving a vehicle owned by his employer, Miranda Groves & Nurseries, Inc., [Miranda] and provided Hurta-do for his personal use as part of his employment compensation.1 Miranda carried uninsured motorist coverage with FFB on Hurtado’s…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Mullis v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1971
- Sellers v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1966
- Travelers Ins. Co. v. PacDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1976
- Coleman v. Florida Ins. Guar. Ass'n, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1988
- American States Ins. Co. v. KelleyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Florida Farm Bureau Cas. Co. v. HurtadoSupreme Court of Florida · 1991
- Young v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1991
- Carolina Casualty Insurance v. ChambersCircuit Court for the Judicial Circuits of Florida · 1990