Legal Opinion

Houze Glass Corp. v. Commonwealth

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 25, 1979No. Appeal, No. 2210 C.D. 1978PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Rogers,

Houze Glass Corporation and Kansas City Eire & Marine Insurance Company, its workmen’s compensation carrier, have appealed from an order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board affirming a referee’s award of benefits to William Cullen for disability from silicosis provided for by Section 108 (k) of The Pennsylvania Workmen’s Compensation Act, Act of June 2,1915, P.L. 736, as amended, added by Act of October 17, 1972, §1, P.L. 930, as amended, 77 P.S. §27.1 (k). Section 301(c) of the Act, 77 P.S. §411(2), requires, for workmen’s compensation benefits to attach, that…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp. v. GolmitzCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Witco-Kendall Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  2. Purex, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  3. Bucyrus-Erie Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  4. Commonwealth v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API