Cribbs v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
WHATLEY, Judge.
In a motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a), Simon Cribbs challenged his enhanced sentences as a violent career criminal (VCC). We affirm the dismissal of claim one but hold that Cribbs is entitled to relief on claim two.
Claim one of Cribbs’ motion is identical to a claim raised in a prior rule 3.800(a) motion. He obtained relief on that claim pursuant to Cribbs v. State, 978 So.2d 828 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008). The postconviction court correctly dismissed this portion of Cribbs’ motion as moot.
In claim two, Cribbs challenges the VCC sentence imposed upon…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. HearnsSupreme Court of Florida · 2007
- State v. CollinsSupreme Court of Florida · 2008
- Cillo v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
- Cribbs v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008
- Molfetto v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Benjamin v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009