Legal Opinion

People v. Dunnigan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 30, 1992PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant contends that the court erred in summarily denying his motion to suppress the identification testimony of one of the victims, Robert Nuchereno, because the bank security investigator who showed the photographs of defendant to Nuchereno was acting as a police agent. We disagree. The investigator acted on his own both in preparing the photographs taken from the surveillance machines and in making arrangements to show those photographs to Nuchereno. There was no police involvement or participation in showing the photographs to the victim. None…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. GissendannerNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. People v. MedinaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  3. People v. BlackmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  4. People v. SamuelsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  5. People v. ThorntonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Richard W. Dunnigan v. John P. Keane, Superintendent, Sing Sing Correctional FacilityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
  2. Dunnigan v. KeaneDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API