Legal Opinion

State v. Roesch

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided October 9, 1984No. C8-84-1373PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

POPOVICH, Chief Judge.

Joseph Roesch appeals following a remand of his sentence from this court, 349 N.W.2d 348. The trial court issued an order consistent with our instructions. In a memorandum attached to the order, the trial court said it might change the order if a subsequent decision from the Supreme Court enabled it to do so and if it had the power. Appellant challenges this language in the memorandum and seeks to have the language expunged from the memorandum. We dismiss the appeal.

FACTS

Appellant pleaded guilty to two burglaries. As part of his plea he agreed to pay restitution.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. RoeschCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. HickmanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API