Legal Opinion

McGlinchy v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided May 18, 1910PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRugg, J.

This case comes before us on a report by the Chief Justice of the Superior Court, which in substance is a ruling of law that upon all the evidence bearing on the question of the defendant’s negligence, the plaintiff was not entitled to recover. He then made a finding for the defendant founded on this ruling of law, and reported the ease for determination by this court, with the provision that, if his finding was right, judgment was to be entered thereon ; otherwise, that judgment was to be entered for the plaintiff in the sum of $1,000. The only question pre*8sented is whether there is any…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Silva v. Boston & Maine RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910
  2. Hines v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
  3. Carroll v. Boston & Northern Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1904

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Larson v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
  2. Whiteacre v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
  3. McDermott v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
  4. Cushman v. Boston, Worcester & New York Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
  5. Tracy v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API