Legal Opinion

United States v. Needham

U S Air Force Court of Military Review

Decided October 24, 1984No. ACM 24416PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION

HODGSON, Chief Judge:

The issue before us is narrow and turns upon the admissibility of a Department of Justice periodical * tracing the history, use and effects, both physical and psychological, of hallucinogens and marijuana.

The appellant argues that such evidence was irrelevant during sentencing as he was convicted of distributing lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD) and not its use. He also urges that the information given the members regarding marijuana was as well irrelevant and “unduly prejudicial.”

We disagree. It is well settled law that the prosecution may present evidence which…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. VickersUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
  2. United States v. HoustonU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1978

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. NeedhamUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987
  2. United States v. EadsU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API