Legal Opinion

Warex Terminals Inc. v. Halsted Energy

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided May 11, 2004No. Docket No. 02-5040PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

HURD, District Judge, filed an opinion concurring in part, dissenting in part.

POOLER, Circuit Judge.

Beginning in 1993, A. Tarricone, Inc. (“ATI”) and HQP issued three promissory notes totaling $390,000, as joint and several obligors, to Warex for gasoline purchased on credit (the “Notes”). ATI and HQP secured their obligations under the Notes by mortgages on two properties owned by ATI and a third piece of property owned by its affiliate, Majac Enterprises, Inc. ATI and HQP also executed security agreements.

ATI is owned by three individuals who are officers and directors of Halstead Energy…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In Re: Wayne E. Bell, Jr., Debtor. Wayne E. Bell, Jr. v. Deborah BellCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
  2. In Re MilhamCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In RE HALSTEAD ENERGY CORP., DEBTORS, WAREX TERMINALS INC., MID-VALLEY OIL CO., INC., — v. HALSTEAD ENERGY, HALSTEAD QUINN PROPANE, INC., —Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API