Indemnity Ins. Co. of North America v. Sparra
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion
On Rehearing.
We have examined appellant’s motion for rehearing, and are satisfied with the conclusions reached in the original opinion, but desire to make a few additional remarks on what the appellant calls its ninth proposition, wherein it is urged that the court committed fundamental error in the manner in which he submitted question No. 1, in that the same called not only for a finding of a reasonable attorney’s fee for services rendered by the plaintiff’s attorney in the institution and prosecution of the instant suit, but permitted the jury to include therein an element of attorney’s…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Gulf, Texas & Western Railway Co. v. DickeyTexas Supreme Court · 1916
- International & Great Northern Railroad v. McVeyTexas Supreme Court · 1905
- Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. FarmerTexas Supreme Court · 1909
- Hines v. KelleyTexas Commission of Appeals · 1923
- Largent v. EtheridgeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.