Legal Opinion

Payne v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided November 13, 1986No. 68180PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

This is a petition to review Payne v. State, 480 So.2d 202 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985), in which the district court held that the trial court did not err in considering Payne’s habitual offender status as a reason for departure from sentencing guidelines. We find conflict with Whitehead v. State, 498 *414So.2d 863 (Fla.1986).* While .we approve Payne’s conviction, we remand to the district court with directions to return this cause to the trial court for resentencing consistent with Whitehead.

It is so ordered.

McDonald, C.J., and ADKINS, BOYD, EHRLICH, SHAW and BARKETT, JJ., concur. OVERTON, J., dissents…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Whitehead v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1986
  2. Payne v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hall v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
  2. Harrell v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
  3. Everage v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
  4. Vicknair v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API